McDonald v. Astrue
Plaintiff: James McDonald
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2011cv00202
Filed: September 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Delta Division Office
County: Quitman
Presiding Judge: Glen H. Davidson
Presiding Judge: Jane M Virden
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT in favor of James McDonald against Michael J. Astrue. The case is REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Jane M Virden on 8/7/12. (ncb)
April 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting plaintiff additional time to file brief. Signed by Jane M Virden on 4/30/12. (ncb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James McDonald
Represented By: Thomas Upton Reynolds, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?