Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant: Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Case Number: 3:2016cv00133
Filed: June 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Oxford Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Debra M. Brown
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 11/9/16. (jtm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Represented By: Frank John Dantone, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?