Parker v. Upright Installation, LLC et al
| Aramis Parker |
| Orlando Davies and Upright Installation, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00037 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice Pursuant to #6 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Aramis Parker. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 4/9/2019. (lpm)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christopher William Espy on behalf of Aramis Parker (Espy, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Past Due Answer as to Orlando Davies (jla) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Upright Installation, LLC (jla) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher William Espy on behalf of Aramis Parker Orlando Davies served on 3/5/2019. (Espy, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Orlando Davies, Upright Installation, LLC. E-mailed to attorneys for service. (tab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1647897, filed by Aramis Parker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Parker's Pay Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
