Lewis v. State of Mississippi et al
| Larry Lewis |
| State of Mississippi and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi |
| 3:2019cv00120 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order granting Motion to Proceed IFP and Directing State to Respond. (jla) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #4 Order,, Set Deadlines,, Terminate Motions, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Acknowledgment filed by Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, State of Mississippi. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING STATE TO RESPOND; Attorney General for the State of Mississippi answer due 9/3/2019; State of Mississippi answer due 9/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 6/20/19. (cr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P. Mills and Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. (cr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Larry Lewis. (cr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Panola) filed by Larry Lewis. (cr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
