M. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
| M. D. |
| Juul Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc. |
| 3:2019cv00180 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Glen H Davidson |
| Roy Percy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 10/1/19. (bnd)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending JPML Determination by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Kaufman, R.) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by F. Hall Bailey on behalf of M. D. Altria Group, Inc. served on 9/25/2019. (Bailey, F.) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by F. Hall Bailey on behalf of M. D. Philip Morris USA, Inc. served on 9/25/2019. (Bailey, F.) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., and Philip Morris USA, Inc. (jla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Keith Morgan on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Morgan, Robert) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1709750, filed by M. D.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
