Melton et al v. Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated
David B. Melton, 247 Farms, Inc. and Pea Patch Road Farms LLP |
Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated |
3:2022cv00161 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Sharion Aycock |
Roy Percy |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Trial: MVD Jury Trial set for 11/6/2023 09:40 AM in Aberdeen Bankruptcy Courthouse - Courtroom 2 before District Judge Sharion Aycock. (tjw) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF SERVICE of First Set of Requests for Production of Documents or Things from Plaintiffs to Defendant by Jeffrey S. Dilley on behalf of 247 Farms, Inc., David B. Melton, Pea Patch Road Farms LLP to Counsel for Defendant. (Dilley, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF SERVICE of First Set of Interrogatories from Plaintiffs to Defendant by Jeffrey S. Dilley on behalf of 247 Farms, Inc., David B. Melton, Pea Patch Road Farms LLP to Counsel for Defendant. (Dilley, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy: Case Management Conference held on 9/22/2022. (rtc) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosure by Jeffrey S. Dilley on behalf of 247 Farms, Inc., David B. Melton, Pea Patch Road Farms LLP to Counsel for Defendant. (Dilley, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Rule 26(a)(1)(A) Initial Disclosures by David L. Ayers on behalf of Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated to Plaintiffs. (Ayers, David) |
Filing 7 STATE COURT RECORD - REMOVAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - PL Ltr to Circ Clerk, #3 Exhibit C - Summons - Great Plains, #4 Exhibit D - Order, #5 Exhibit E - Circ Clerk Ltr, #6 Exhibit F - Order, #7 Exhibit G - Order, #8 Exhibit H - Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit I - NOF NOR (Circuit)) (Ayers, David) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (Ayers, David) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to State Court Complaint with Jury Demand by Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated. (Ayers, David) |
![]() |
Filing 3 CORPORATE STATEMENT of Defendant Great Plains Manufacturing, Inc. (Ayers, David) |
Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated, filed by David B. Melton, 247 Farms, Inc., Pea Patch Road Farms LLP. (jla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated from Tunica County Circuit Court, case number 2022-0080. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSNDC-2123785) Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 5(b) and the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing for the Northern District of Mississippi, the removing defendant must electronically file a copy of the entire state court record within 14 days of the date of removal. The state court record will be filed using the event State Court Record - Removal. Attach the Notice/Certificate of Filing State Court Record as the main document with each state court document attached as a separate PDF. All attachments must be clearly identified. The state court record can not be filed conventionally., filed by Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Documents served on Defendant, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.