Brooks v. Northwest Airlines C, et al
| 4:2004cv00291 |
| September 27, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Eugene M. Bogen |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
FINAL JUDGMENT dismissing action with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 9/23/2009. (pbs, USDC)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER affirming order of Magistrate Judge re 103 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by Virginia McKinne Brooks. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 9/22/2009. (pbs, USDC)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER denying 115 Motion to Stay. Signed by David A. Sanders on 9/11/2009. (sef)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER denying 93 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by David A. Sanders on 8/27/09. (sef)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying 69 Motion to Extend CMO; granting 79 Motion to Quash. Signed by David A. Sanders on 7/20/09. (ncb, USDC)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER vacating 37 Order. Signed by David A. Sanders on 10/27/08. (ncb, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooks v. Northwest Airlines C, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
