Turner v. State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Edwin Hart Turner
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Case Number:
4:2007cv00077
Filed:
May 16, 2007
Court:
Mississippi Northern District Court
Office:
Greenville Division Office
County:
Carroll
Presiding Judge:
W. Allen Pepper
Nature of Suit:
Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action:
28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
April 15, 2010 | 72 |
![]() |
February 19, 2010 | 70 |
![]() |
February 8, 2008 | 22 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Turner v. State of Mississippi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Edwin Hart Turner | |
Represented By: | James W. Craig |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: State of Mississippi | |
Represented By: | Marvin L. White, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.