Stafford v. Kelly et al
| Roy Stafford |
| Lawrence Kelly, Emitt L. Sparkman, Gloria Perry, James Burke and David Petrie |
| 4:2009cv00133 |
| February 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Greenville Division Office |
| Sunflower |
| Jerry A. Davis |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 88 Report and Recommendations, 90 Motion to Alter Judgment filed by Roy Stafford. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 7/5/2011. (pls)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 . Defendants Kelly, Sparkman, and Petrie are dismissed from this case with prejudice. Plaintiff's complaints against the remaining defendants, Dr. Gloria Perry and Dr. James Burke, will PROCEED. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 5/26/10. (cr, USDC)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration re 19 Memorandum Opinion, 18 Order on Motion for TRO. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 5/21/2010. (pls, USDC)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 18 Final Judgment on Motion for TRO. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 2/26/2010. (pbs, USDC)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 15 Objection (appeal) re 11 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 2/16/2010. (pbs, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
