Cruse v. Banks et al
Andrew C. Cruse, Jr. |
Warden Wendel Banks and Attorney General State of Mississippi |
4:2019cv00163 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Michael P Mills |
Jane M Virden |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew C. Cruse, Jr. (jla) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andrew C. Cruse, Jr. (jla) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andrew C. Cruse, Jr. (jla) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order. (jla) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 Notice of Assignment. (jla) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #1 Order. (jla) |
Filing 4 ORDER requiring the petitioner to pay the filing fee or submit a completed in forma pauperis request including inmate account information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/18/19. (jla) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Filing 1 ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 11/7/2019. (lpm) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Harrison County), filed by Andrew C. Cruse, Jr. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.