Carter v. State of Mississippi
Plaintiff: Kenneth Carter
Defendant: State of Mississippi and Joe Errington
In Re: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 1:2019cv00121
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: John C Gargiulo
Referring Judge: Halil S Ozerden
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2019 Filing 7 Letter from USCA to Kenneth Dewayne Carter re: transfer of successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 motion. USCA #19-60234. (Attachments: #1 - transfer order) (JCH)
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER EPPS SUCCESSIVE: Ordered that the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case pending the decision of USCA for 5th Circuit. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 4/11/19. (JCH)
April 8, 2019 Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kenneth Carter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 - Various Undescribed Exhibits)(JCH)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Clerk to edit the case docket to reflect that this case is proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2254. On or before April 17, 2019, Carter shall complete sign and file a form "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in State Custody" (Form AO-241). Clerk to mail a copy of this order along with attached form to petitioner at his address of record. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 3/27/2019 (Attachments: #1 2254 Form)(wld)
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Carter (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JCH)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Ordered that on or before April 5, 2019, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5 filing fee. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 3/6/19. (JCH)
March 4, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kenneth Carter (Attachments: #1 Various Documents, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment) (RLW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. State of Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Errington
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?