Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert Wilson Edwards, Jr. |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA General Counsel |
| 1:2021cv00052 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
| Taylor B McNeel |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (RLW) |
| Remark: Original summonses for service and return were mailed to attorney Michael B. McHenry to address on docket via regular us mail. (RLW) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF BRIEFS. Signed by Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac on 4/2/21 (Lewis, Nijah)
|
| Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 14643013129 (RLW) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER *RESTRICTED* denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge LaKeysha Greer Isaac on 3/17/21 (CCO)
|
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Wilson Edwards, Jr. (Plaintiff's signature is not original) (RLW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Robert Wilson Edwards, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Appeals Council Notice dated 12/7/20, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
