Ables v. United States of America et al
Joe Ables |
John Does Persons A-M, United States of America and John Doe Entities N-Z |
1:2021cv00092 |
March 26, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
John C Gargiulo |
Halil S Ozerden |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Ables. (Philley, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Ables. United States of America served on 5/6/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Philley, Benjamin) Modified to correct service date and answer due date on 5/10/2021 (JCH). |
Reset Deadlines: United States of America answer due 7/6/2021. (JCH) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 3. The date of service according to the proof of service is 5/6/21, not 5/4/21. Clerk's Office has reset the answer due date to 7/6/21. Per the summons, the United States get 60 days to respond, not 21 days. (JCH) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (RLW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with jury demand, against John Doe Entities N-Z, John Does Persons A-M, United States of America (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 14643013124), filed by Joe Ables (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Remark: Original summonses for service and return mailed to attorney in SASE provided by attorney (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.