Dyess v. Hernandez Consulting, Inc. et al
| Michelle Dyess |
| Hernandez Consulting, Inc., Hernandez Consulting & Construction, Ross Hutchinson and John or Jane Does 1-5 |
| 1:2023cv00005 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Halil S Ozerden |
| Bradley W Rath |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Jefferson R. Tillery to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-5057914) by Hernandez Consulting, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Application for Admission)(Stone, Adam) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Service of (to Ross Hutchinson) Request for Production by Michelle Dyess (Tynes, Douglas) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Service of (to Ross Hutchinson) Interrogatories by Michelle Dyess (Tynes, Douglas) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Service of (to Hernandez Consulting, Inc.) Request for Production by Michelle Dyess (Tynes, Douglas) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Service of (to Hernandez Consulting, Inc.) Interrogatories by Michelle Dyess (Tynes, Douglas) |
Filing 16
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Plaintiff's Disclosure due by 2/17/2023. Jury Trial set for a three week trial calendar beginning on 2/5/2024 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 806 (Gulfport) before District Judge Halil S. Ozerden. Pretrial Conference set for 1/16-18/2024 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 806 (Gulfport) before District Judge Halil S. Ozerden. Discovery due by 8/4/2023. Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 3/20/2023. Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 3/20/2023. Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 4/5/2023. Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 5/5/2023. Motions due by 8/18/2023. Settlement Conference set for 9/25/2023 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 683 (Gulfport) before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. ADR Report due by 1/9/2024. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/16/2024. EDT: 4-5 days. Parties do not consent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 2/17/2023 (AB)
|
|
Filing 15
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER, resolving Defendant Ross Hutchinson's #10 Motion to Stay Litigation in Whole or Part or, in the alternative, for a Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 2/17/23 (HM)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Service of Initial Discovery Disclosure by Michelle Dyess (Tynes, Douglas) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 2/17/2023. PARTICIPANTS: Douglas L. Tynes, Jr. (counsel for Plaintiff); Adam Stone and Justin J. Marocco - PHV (counsel for Defendant Hernandez Consulting, Inc.); Danny J. Collier, Jr. (counsel for Defendant Ross Hutchinson). A Case Management Order will be entered. (AB) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Rule 26(a)(1)(A) Initial Disclosure by Ross Hutchinson (Collier, Danny) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #10. This document requests two motion reliefs. Each motion relief should be selected from the list of motion titles or each relief docketed separately. The same PDF document may be used for all motion filing entries. It is not necessary to refile as clerk has made the necessary correction by adding the alternative relief for "Protective Order". Attorney is advised to follow this procedure in future filings. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #11: Counsel should include the exhibit letter in the description of each exhibit in future filings. Clerk has made the correction. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #12: Incorrect document attached. Per L.U.Civ.R. 5.(d)(1), pre-discovery disclosure of core information should not be filed with the clerk. Only a notice of service of pre-discovery disclosure [Official Form No. 2(c)] should be filed with the Court. Attorney is directed to file a Notice of Service of Disclosure. Document #12 will be disregarded. (wld) |
| Filing 12 (DISREGARD)NOTICE of Service of Rule 26(a)(1)(A) Initial Disclosure by Ross Hutchinson (Collier, Danny) Modified on 2/10/2023 (wld). |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Stay Case in Whole or in Part or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order (Disputed) filed by Ross Hutchinson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Indictment, #2 Exhibit B: Notice of Trial)(Collier, Danny) Modified on 2/10/2023 (wld). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Case in Whole or in Part or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order (Disputed) by Ross Hutchinson (Collier, Danny). Added MOTION for Protective Order on 2/10/2023 (wld). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Rule 4 Summons Executed as to Defendant, Ross Hutchinson by Michelle Dyess (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Executed Summons for Ross Hutchinson)(Tynes, Douglas) |
| Filing 8 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2023 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #6. Incorrect event code selected. Counsel should have selected "Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)" which can be found under "Other Answers". Counsel does not need to refile. (wld) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hernandez Consulting, Inc. (Stone, Adam) |
| Filing 6 Hernandez Consulting Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Hernandez Consulting, Inc..(Stone, Adam) |
| Filing 5 State Court Record by Defendant Hernandez Consulting, Inc. (Marocco - PHV, Justin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Rule 4 Summons Executed as to Defendant, Hernandez Consulting, Inc. by Michelle Dyess (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Executed Summons for Hernandez Consulting, Inc.)(Tynes, Douglas) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. That Attorney Justin J. Marocco be admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendant Hernandez Consulting, Inc. in association with local counsel conditioned upon completion of the registration procedures found on the Court's website and at the following link: https://www.mssd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions-page. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 1/11/2023 (AB)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #3. Counsel should include the case number on future filings. Counsel does not need to refile. (wld) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Justin J. Marocco to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hernandez Consulting, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Stone, Adam) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2. Incorrect event code selected. Counsel should have selected "Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)" which can be found under "Other Answers". Counsel does not need to refile. (wld) |
| Pro Hac Vice fee paid for Justin J. Marocco receipt number AMSSDC-5020018 $ 100 (Stone, Adam) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Ross Hutchinson.(Collier, Danny) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hernandez Consulting, Inc. from Jackson County Circuit Court, case number 22-00,213. Lower court jury demand. (Filing fee $ 402; receipt number 5017040) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent to Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
