Daniels v. Seahorse Underwriters et al
Ronnie Daniels |
Seahorse Underwriters and Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions |
1:2024cv00214 |
July 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Robert P Myers |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Seahorse Underwriters (Kidd, Dean) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Seahorse Underwriters.(Kidd, Dean) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 14. Attorney is advised that this document should have been filed as an "Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)", which can be found under the "Other Answers" category. DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 14 and # 15. The defendant is named as Seahorse Underwriters and should be named as such in all future filings. If the party was named incorrectly, a Motion to Change Name should be filed with the court. (JCH) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Ronnie Daniels (Thompson, Michael) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions (Graham, Allen) |
Filing 11 **DISREGARD**RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions (Graham, Allen) Modified on 8/15/2024 (JCH). |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 11. Incorrect event chosen. This document should be re-filed as a Memorandum in Opposition. This document will be disregarded on the docket. (JCH) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Strike #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by Ronnie Daniels (Thompson, Michael) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Strike #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Ronnie Daniels (Thompson, Michael) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - declaration of Rita Boggan)(Graham, Allen) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Ronnie Daniels (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Daniels Affidavit and Exhibits)(Thompson, Michael) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Stay Proceedings . The response is due by 8/2/2024. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr., on 7/30/2024. (BR) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Ronnie Daniels (Thompson, Michael) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions (Graham, Allen) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum in support of motion to compel arbitration)(Graham, Allen). Added MOTION to Stay Proceedings on 7/17/2024 (JCH). |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 4. 1.) This document requests several motion reliefs. Every motion relief should be selected from the list of motion titles or each relief docketed separately. The same PDF document may be used for all motion filing entries. It is not necessary to refile as court staff has made the necessary correction. Attorney is advised to follow this procedure in future filings. 2.) The Motion and exhibits are filed as one main document. Exhibits should be scanned separately and docketed as properly identified attachments to the main document within the same docket entry. Attorney is directed to follow this procedure in future filings. L.U.Civ.R. 7.(b)(2). 3.) Memoranda in support should be filed separately and shown as a related document to the motion (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec. 3.A.7). Attorney is directed to file the Memorandum as a separate document and link it to the appropriate document. (JCH) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions.(Graham, Allen) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions identifying Corporate Parent Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Intact Financial Corporation, Corporate Parent Intact Insurance Group USA Holdings, Inc. for Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions. (Graham, Allen) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to # 3. Attorney is advised that this document should have been filed as an "Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal)", which can be found under the "Other Answers" category. Attorney does not need to re-file, but should follow this procedure in the future. (JCH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions from Circuit Court of Harrison Co., MS, 1st Jud. Dist., case number A2401-24-144, jury demand lower court. (Filing fee $405.00, receipt number 5448378) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RLW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.