Rodriguez et al v. United States Postal Service et al
Crystal Davis Rodriguez and A. R. |
United States and United States Postal Service |
1:2024cv00227 |
July 25, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Taylor B McNeel |
Robert P Myers |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by United States.(Mayer, Jr.-Federal Gov, Robert) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Crystal Davis Rodriguez. United States served on 7/26/2024, answer due 9/24/2024. (Lee, Kenneth) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #5: Advising attorney that the first page of the summons attached to docket entry #3 should not have been used for this entry. The original issued summons by the clerk's office should have been used. Attorney is not required to re-file, but is advised to only use original issued summonses in the future. (RLW) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by A. R., Crystal Davis Rodriguez (Lee, Kenneth) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States/U.S. Attorney, United States Postal Service. (wld) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* DOCUMENT: Unredacted Complaint (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Filing 1 REDACTED COMPLAINT against United States, United States Postal Service ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 2300), filed by Crystal Davis Rodriguez, A. R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wld) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.