Jordan et al v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
Patricia L. Jordan and Jack J. Jordan |
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company and American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
1:2024cv00273 |
September 5, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Louis Guirola |
Bradley W Rath |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jack J. Jordan, Patricia L. Jordan. American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company served on 9/16/2024, answer due 10/7/2024. (Ott, Paul) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jack J. Jordan, Patricia L. Jordan. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company served on 9/11/2024, answer due 10/2/2024. (Ott, Paul) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company, State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (JCH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company, State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405; receipt number 2397), filed by Jack J. Jordan, Patricia L. Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Issued summons returned to attorney via SASE (JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.