United States of America v. $155,860.57 U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| $32,918.44 U.S. Currency and $155,860.57 U.S. Currency |
| 1:2024cv00283 |
| September 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert P Myers |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 10/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Proof of Publication)(Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #1 Complaint, #2 Notice (Other) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Proof of Service)(Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 4 Warrant of Arrest in Rem Issued. (RLW) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Baldwin-Federal Gov, Clay) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $155,860.57 U.S. Currency, $32,918.44 U.S. Currency, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of FBI TFO Joseph Bignell, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JCH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
