Plum Creek Marketing, Inc. v. Hazlehurst Lumber Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Plum Creek Marketing, Inc.
Defendant: Hazlehurst Lumber Company, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00155
Filed: July 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Copiah
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying Defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on September 21, 2011 (dsl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plum Creek Marketing, Inc. v. Hazlehurst Lumber Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plum Creek Marketing, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence C. Gunn, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hazlehurst Lumber Company, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Varas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?