Bounds v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Carla J. Bounds
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2012cv00124
Filed: July 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Hattiesburg Office
County: Jones
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER PARTIALLY ACCEPTING AND MODIFYING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's Objections are partially granted and partially overruled. This case is remanded back to the Commissioner with the instructions set forth in the Order. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/27/2013 (scp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bounds v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla J. Bounds
Represented By: Angela E. Davis-Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?