Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company v. Cooley et al
Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company |
Tammy Cooley, Walter Cooley and Sunrise Trading Post, LLC |
2:2016cv00039 |
March 31, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Michael T. Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER. Plaintiff has until on or before March 2, 2017 to respond to 68 Objection and Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Order. If Movant wishes to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before March 9, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/17/2017 (dtj) |
Filing 67 ORDER. Responses to Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment are due on or before February 17, 2017. If Movants want to reply, they must do so within seven days of the filing of the response, but no later than February 24, 2017. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/6/2017 (dtj) |
Filing 62 ORDER denying 58 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on February 2, 2017. (js) |
Filing 54 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Compel; and denying 51 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on January 6, 2017. (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.