Edmonson v. Matthews
Kenny F. Edmonson |
Shondra Matthews |
Pro Se Department |
2:2018cv00152 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Eastern (Hattiesburg) Office |
Hinds |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Certificate of Appealability should not issue. The applicant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/5/2018. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 3 FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with the Order of Dismissal, dismissing without prejudice the Petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/5/2018. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 2 ORDER of DISMISSAL, Kenny F. Edmonson's pro se Petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is dismissed without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/5/2018. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5.00 receipt number 24643005851), filed by Kenny F. Edmonson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Notice of Assignment, #3 Envelope) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.