Moore v. City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department et al
| Gary Moore |
| City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department and SKL Investment Inc. Edgewood LLC |
| 2:2018cv00191 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP. Objections to R&R due by 12/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on December 3, 2018. (js) |
Filing 3
ORDER re Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on November 19, 2018. (js)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #1 : Style of case incorrect. Pro se litigant is directed to use "Eastern Division" instead of "Hattiesburg Division" in future filings. (CS) |
| Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Moore. (CS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department, SKL Investment Inc. Edgewood LLC, filed by Gary Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
