Backstrom v. Truvision Health, LLC et al
| Ashley Backstrom |
| XYZ Corporation, Truvision Health, LLC and Terri Tew |
| 2:2018cv00199 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Letter to Martha F. Clark, Clerk, transmitting certified copies of the remand Memorandum Opinion and Order and docket sheet. (LDR) |
Filing 14
ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss; granting #7 Motion to Remand to State Court. A certified copy of the Order and docket sheet mailed to Circuit Court of Perry County, Mississippi. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/17/2019. (LDR)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Truvision Health, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declarations)(Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Remand-Related Request for Admissions by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Remand-Related Request for Production by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Remand-Related Interrogatories by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ashley Backstrom (Schmidt, George) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER staying discovery and disclosure requirements pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on December 10, 2018 (KPM)
|
|
TEXT ORDER re #7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ashley Backstrom. The motion was filed without a memorandum of law as required by L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). The plaintiff is ordered to file a memorandum of law in support of the motion on or before 12/12/18. Response to the motion shall be due on or before 12/26/18, and any reply shall be due on or before 1/2/19. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 12/10/18 (lm)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Ashley Backstrom (Schmidt, George) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Truvision Health, LLC. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 11/28/18 (lm)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Truvision Health, LLC (Gregory, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Lewis Champagne on behalf of Truvision Health, LLC (Champagne, Amy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Truvision Health, LLC from Circuit Court of Perry County, Mississippi, case number 2018-0065 H. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3860428) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
