Patton v. Csaszar
| Bobby L. Patton, Jr. |
| Warden Joshua Csaszar |
| Pro Se Department |
| 2:2019cv00036 |
| March 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Keith Starrett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bobby L. Patton, Jr. (LDR) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bobby L. Patton, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indictment, #2 Exhibit B - Application for Post-Conviction Relief, #3 Exhibit C - Order Requiring Sate to File Response - May 4, 2016, #4 Exhibit D - States Response, #5 Exhibit E - Motion for Additional Time to File Reply - June 8, 2016, #6 Exhibit F - Patton's Response to States Response - June 30, 2016, #7 Exhibit G - Order Dismissing Application and Motion for Additional Time - June 29, 2016, #8 Exhibit H - Excerpts from Trial Record Transcript, #9 Exhibit I - Statement of Marcus Howard entered as Exhibit 6 by State, #10 Exhibit J - Order)(LDR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bobby L. Patton, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LDR) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2019: #2 Notice of Assignment) (LDR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
