Conerly v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Merlean B. Conerly
Defendant: XYZ Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5 and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv00125
Filed: August 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Michael T Parker
Referring Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Plaintiffs Prediscovery Disclosure by Merlean B. Conerly (Williams, Lampton)
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Benton Shaw on behalf of Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (Shaw, Mary)
October 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (Bagwell, Douglas)
October 22, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (Bagwell, Douglas)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 10/31/2019 2:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 10/25/19. (KPM)
August 28, 2019 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (Bagwell, Douglas)
August 27, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. from Circuit Court of Marion County, Mississippi, case number 19cv190CM. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4074118) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit B - 2019 Corporate Annual Report)(LDR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conerly v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Merlean B. Conerly
Represented By: Lampton O'Neal Williams, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Corporations 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas Bagwell
Represented By: Mary Benton Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?