Hicks v. Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC
| Jamye L. Hicks |
| Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00138 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting Defendant's #3 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/8/2019. (LDR)
|
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss , #8 Response to Motion filed by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC (Lee, Preston) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jamye L. Hicks (Abernathy, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC. Response due 10/3/19; reply due 10/10/19. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 9/23/19. (cb)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC identifying Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation for Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC. (Lee, Preston) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC.(Lee, Preston) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC (Lee, Preston) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint)(Lee, Preston) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Stefan G. Bourn on behalf of Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC (Bourn, Stefan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC from County Court of Jones County, Mississippi, case number 2019-060-CV8. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4088167) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Certified State Court Record, #5 Exhibit D - Mississippi SOS Details, #6 Exhibit E - Rhode Island SOS Details, #7 Exhibit F - Affidavit of Melanie Luker)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hicks v. Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Preston O. Lee |
| Represented By: | Stefan G. Bourn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamye L. Hicks | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence E. Abernathy, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
