Hancock v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
| Kimberly M. Hancock |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC |
| 2:2021cv00113 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| The case has been opened in the Western District of Pennsylvania as case 2:21-cv-01450, filed 10/22/2021. (LDR) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER, transferring this case to the Western District of Pennsylvania, assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(LDR) |
| Filing 9 Copy of Conditional Transfer Order entered by JPML In Re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 3014. (LDR) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC identifying Corporate Parent Koninklijke Philips Naamloze Venootschap, Corporate Parent Philips Holding USA Inc., Corporate Parent Philips RS North America Holding Corporation for Philips RS North America LLC; Corporate Parent Koninklijke Philips Naamloze Venootschap, Corporate Parent Philips Holding USA Inc. for Philips North America LLC. (Wimberly, Charles) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wimberly, Charles) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC (Wimberly, Charles) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Corbett Wimberly, III on behalf of Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC (Wimberly, Charles) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER rescinding text order granting Motion #3 for Patrick Pendley to Appear Pro Hac Vice and Motion #4 for Andrea Barient to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motions are hereby denied for failure to attach certificates of good standing by the appropriate licensing authority. See L.U.R.Civ.83.1(d)(4). The motions may be refiled with the required information. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on September 9, 2021 (KPM)
|
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Patrick Pendley and Andrea Barient are hereby admitted pro hac vice upon registering for electronic filing. No further written order will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on September 9, 2021 (KPM) Modified on 9/9/2021 (KPM). Modified on 9/9/2021 (KPM).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Andrea Barient to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-4651553) by Kimberly M. Hancock (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Deakle, John) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Patrick Pendley to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number AMSSDC-4651542) by Kimberly M. Hancock (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificate of Good Standing)(Deakle, John) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (LDR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4641446), filed by Kimberly M. Hancock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Medical Device Recall)(LDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
