Fluker v. State of Mississippi
LaQuan A. Fluker and LaQuon A. Fluker |
State of Mississippi |
Pro Se Department |
2:2021cv00121 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Certificate of Appealability Denied. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/19/2021. (CS) |
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT, pursuant to the Order issued this date, this cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/19/2021. (CS) |
Filing 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order, the instant case will be dismissed as duplicative. This cause should be and is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A separate final judgment shall issue. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 10/19/2021. (CS) |
Filing 3 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 09/23/2021. (CS) |
Filing 2 (Unsigned) *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LaQuan A. Fluker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (CS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LaQuan A. Fluker. (Attachments: #1 Lab Report, #2 Notice of Assignment, #3 Envelope) (CS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.