Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Ernest Craig Keith |
Commissioner of Social Security |
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel |
2:2024cv00127 |
August 20, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Una McGeehan-Federal Gov on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (McGeehan-Federal Gov, Una) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER #5 filed by Ernest Craig Keith. (Attachments: #1 Attachment - Filed Order) (CAD) Modified on 10/8/2024 (CAD). |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re IFP Motion. Objections to R&R due by 10/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on September 30, 2024. (js) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela Givens Williams-Federal Gov on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Williams-Federal Gov, Angela) |
Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ernest Craig Keith. (CAD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Ernest Craig Keith. (Attachments: #1 Complaint For Review of Social Security Admin Decision With Attachments, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CAD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.