Sayles v. Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronald Sayles
Defendant: Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv00911
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Northern (Jackson) Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: F. Keith Ball
Presiding Judge: Carlton W. Reeves
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 71 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 8/26/2016. (EJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sayles v. Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Sayles
Represented By: John N. Rocray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Recovery Systems, Inc.
Represented By: William V. Westbrook, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?