Hudson et al v. Windows USA, LLC et al
Archie Hudson and Angela Hudson |
Windows USA, LLC, Big Four Companies, Inc. and Wells Fargo, N.A. |
3:2016cv00596 |
July 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Northern (Jackson) Office |
Rankin |
F. Keith Ball |
Daniel P. Jordan |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Compel; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set out in the Order. Defendants Windows USA, LLC, d/b/a Windows USA and Alaskan Window Systems, and Big Four Companies, Inc.'s Joinder 17 in Wells Fargo's Motion to Compel Arbitration will be set for oral argument. Counsel should contact the undersigned's Courtroom Deputy, Shone Powell, within seven days of the entry of this Order to set the matter. Supplemental ten-page briefs, addressing the issues raised by the Court herein, shall be filed ten days before the scheduled hearing. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on April 5, 2017. (SP) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 15 Motion for Discovery; granting in part 19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply for the reasons stated in the order. Plaintiffs shall file their response(s) to the motion to compel arbitration and the joinder therein within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on November 3, 2016. (SP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.