McDale v. Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC
Plaintiff: Carolyn McDale
Defendant: Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv00808
Filed: November 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: John C Gargiulo
Referring Judge: Halil S Ozerden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2019 Pro Hac Vice fee paid by Neal J. McNamara $ 100, receipt number 34643053329. (ND)
January 14, 2019 Filing 9 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2019 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo. (AB)
January 14, 2019 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Neal J. McNamara. Neal J. McNamara is admitted pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendant Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC in association with local counsel upon payment of the pro hac admission fee and upon registration for electronic filing. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE FROM THE COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 1/14/2019 (AB)
January 11, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Neal J. McNamara to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certificates of Good Standing)(Gates, Adam)
January 3, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC (Gates, Adam)
December 28, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC.(Gates, Adam)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Agreed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is December 31, 2018. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John C. Gargiulo on 12/11/2018 (AG)
December 10, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC (Gates, Adam)
November 27, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carolyn McDale. Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC served on 11/26/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Watson, Louis)
November 21, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Nicholas Norris on behalf of Carolyn McDale (Norris, Robert)
November 19, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC. (VM)
November 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0538-3858890), filed by Carolyn McDale. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B - EEOC RTS, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(VM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDale v. Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Millstone Medical Outsourcing, LLC
Represented By: Neal J. McNamara - PHV
Represented By: Adam H. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn McDale
Represented By: Louis H. Watson, Jr.
Represented By: Robert Nicholas Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?