Toliver v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Petitioner: Christopher Toliver and Dante Hall
Respondent: Pelicia Hall
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2019cv00037
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Referring Judge: Michael T Parker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2019 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Pelicia Hall, through Jim Hood served on 3/11/2019, answer due 4/1/2019. (VM)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #2 , #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. State of Mississippi is hereby removed and Pelicia Hall is added as a Respondent in this cause. Respondent Pelicia Hall, through Jim Hood, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon the said Jim Hood of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 03/08/2019. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
February 1, 2019 Filing 4 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in response to #3 Order, by Christopher Toliver. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, on or before February 19, 2019, Petitioner shall complete and file the attached application OR pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 01/17/2019. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS)
January 16, 2019 Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Toliver. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM)
January 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Christopher Toliver. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(VM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toliver v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Toliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dante Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pelicia Hall
Represented By: Jim Hood-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?