Davis v. Hinds Community College et al
| Chakakhan R. Davis |
| Sharon Alexander, John Does 1-20, Mississippi Dept of Education, Dr. Tyrone Jackson, Dr. Clyde Muse, Timothy Rush, Officer Percy Terrell, Hinds Community College and Timothy E. Crisler |
| 3:2019cv00693 |
| September 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Linda R Anderson |
| Henry T Wingate |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Letter from Plaintiff to Arthur Johnston, Clerk. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Recusal of Judge Henry T. Wingate and Judge Anderson by Chakakhan R. Davis. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE : Pro Se (Non Prisoner) Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically by Chakakhan R. Davis. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 2
*RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chakakhan R. Davis. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Sharon Alexander, Timothy E. Crisler, Hinds Community College, Tyrone Jackson, John Does 1-20, Mississippi Dept of Education, Clyde Muse, Timothy Rush, Percy Terrell, filed by Chakakhan R. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Exhibit I, #9 Exhibit J, #10 Exhibit K, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
