Bowman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Sandra Elizabeth Bowman |
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated |
3:2019cv00766 |
October 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Carlton W Reeves |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28:1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:19-cv-03657. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Remark: Transferring Case to the Southern District of Mississippi via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 10/25/2019.] |
![]() |
Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell, with member case number: CV-19-03657-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 10/25/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16965514 filed by Sandra Elizabeth Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 10/25/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.