Johnson v. Paul
| James Johnson |
| Warden David Paul |
| Pro Se Department |
| 3:2019cv00819 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Linda R Anderson |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 12/4/2019 (Copy mailed to plaintiff.) (cwl) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 12/4/2019 (Copies mailed to plaintiff.) (cwl)
|
| Filing 5 Letter Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (VM) Modified on 12/4/2019 (cwl). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER, on or before December 16, 2019, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 11/15/2019. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
|
| Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Documents, #2 Envelope)(VM) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
