McGlothin v. USA
Petitioner: Arrington Lorenzo McGlothin
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2019cv00880
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Filing 2 FINAL JUDGMENT 2255 Dismissing Case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 12/5/19 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff)(MGB)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER Denying Motion to Vacate and Motion for Transcript. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 12/5/19 (MGB)
December 3, 2019 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Criminal Case No. 3:15cr30DPJ-DKB for docket entries. (cwl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGlothin v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arrington Lorenzo McGlothin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?