Clark v. Regis Corporation et al
| Jennifer Lewis Clark |
| Regis Corporation doing business as SmartStyle Hair Salons by Regis and John Does 1-10 |
| 3:2020cv00558 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Linda R Anderson |
| Henry T Wingate |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures by Jennifer Lewis Clark (Guy, Bryant) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Regis Corporation (Williams, H.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA Merit Health Central, Merit Health River Oaks, JMS Burn and Reconstruction Clinic, and Jackson Psychiatry Group/PMC Clinic by Regis Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoenas)(Williams, H.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Cecelia S. Virden on behalf of Regis Corporation (Virden, Cecelia) |
Filing 4
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Disclosure due by 10/15/2020; Jury Trial set for 9/7/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate; Pretrial Conference set for 8/13/2021 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (Jackson) Wingate before District Judge Henry T. Wingate; Discovery due by 3/24/2021; Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 10/30/2020 ; Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 10/30/2020; Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 12/24/2020 ; Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 1/25/2021; Motions due by 4/7/2021; Settlement Conference set for 4/13/2021 09:00 AM in Chambers 6.150 (Jackson) Anderson before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson; ADR Report due by 8/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 9/30/20 (Lewis, Nijah)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 9/30/2020. Participants: Bryant Guy, H. Wesley Williams, III and Ceclia Borden. The Court spoke with counsel. Order to be entered. (Lewis, Nijah) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Regis Corporation.(Williams, H.) |
| Filing 2 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2020 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e-mail to anderson_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall initiate the conference call; and once all parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4440. (Lewis, Nijah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Regis Corporation from Madison County Circuit Court, case number CI-2020-0125-JR. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-4352807) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #4 Exhibit C - Plaintiff's pre-suit demand, #5 Exhibit D - State Court File, #6 Exhibit E - Pleadings Served on Regis Corp.)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
