White et al v. Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC et al
Gloria Collins, Linda White and Gregory Collins |
ABC Corporations, Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, Jane Does 1-10 and John Does 1-10 |
3:2021cv00108 |
February 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
F Keith Ball |
Daniel P Jordan |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Compel; granting #6 Motion to Stay Proceedings. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all claims against Defendant Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC are dismissed without prejudice and shall be submitted to binding arbitration. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 3/18/2021 (PG) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Proceedings. Defense counsel notified the Court via email that Defendant does not object to the requested extension. Plaintiffs' response to the motion shall be filed on or before March 16, 2021. No further written order shall issue. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III on February 23, 2021. (DI) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Gloria Collins, Gregory Collins, Linda White (Timbs, Megan) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B) pending a decision on the Motion to Compel Arbitration at docket no. #6 . No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 2/22/2021. (JEJ) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Gunn, George) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and, MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Admission Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Arbitration Agreement)(Gunn, George) |
Filing 5 State Court Record by Defendant Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Gunn, George) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Gunn, George) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William Davis Frye on behalf of Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Frye, William) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline C. Loveless on behalf of Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC (Loveless, Caroline) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chadwick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC from Hinds County Circuit Court, case number 25CI1:20-cv-656. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0538-4481245) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint serve to Chadwick, #3 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #4 Attachment State Court Complaint)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.