Robinson v. Casler et al
| Terrell Robinson |
| Anthony Casler, Fort Transfer Company and John Doe Entities I-V |
| 3:2021cv00544 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| F Keith Ball |
| Daniel P Jordan |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Anthony Casler, Fort Transfer Company (Ellzey, Scott) |
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Terrell Robinson as to Anthony Casler. (Funches, Delano) |
| Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Terrell Robinson as to Anthony Casler. (Funches, Delano) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Anthony Casler. (KNS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Fort Transfer Company. (KNS) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Terrell Robinson. Fort Transfer Company served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Certified Return Receipt)(Funches, Delano) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Anthony Casler, Fort Transfer Company. (KNS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against Anthony Casler, Fort Transfer Company, John Doe Entities I-V ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4639888), filed by Terrell Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
