Watson v. Bahro et al
| Dianna Watson |
| Abdul Bahro, Jackson HMA, LLC d/b/a Merit Health Central and John Does 1 and 2 |
| 3:2021cv00656 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Kristi H Johnson |
| Michael T Parker |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 Response in Opposition to Motion, #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Dianna Watson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Sessums, Craig) Modified on 11/19/2021 (LAT). |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #11 : Incorrect linkage made. REPLY to Response to Motion should be linked to Motion to Remand. All related filings to motions (using the "Responses and Replies" category, with the exception of "Response to Order") should be linked back to the original motion. Court staff has made the correction. (LAT) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Abdul Bahro, Jackson HMA, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Intent, #2 Exhibit Declaration - Sanford, #3 Exhibit Declaration - Hodges - Signed)(Boykin, Thurman) |
| Docket Annotation as to Doc. #9 : Memorandum of Authorities Supporting Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand should be filed separately and shown as related documents to the Motion to Remand (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec. 3.A.7). Attorney is directed to file each document separately selecting correct event. The Response and Memorandum should be linked to the Motion to Remand.(CO) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Abdul Bahro, Jackson HMA, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Intent, #2 Exhibit Declaration - Sanford, #3 Exhibit Declaration - Hodges - Unsigned)(Boykin, Thurman) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Abdul Bahro.(Boykin, Thurman) |
Filing 7
ORDER staying discovery and disclosure requirements pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on November 2, 2021 (KPM)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Remand filed by Dianna Watson (Sessums, Craig) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Remand by Dianna Watson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Notice to Bahro, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Notice to Merit, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Affidavit Craig, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Affidavit Libby, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Email Kruger)(Sessums, Craig) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen P. Kruger on behalf of Jackson HMA, LLC (Kruger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Hannah Katherine Herrin on behalf of Jackson HMA, LLC (Herrin, Hannah) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Jackson HMA, LLC.(Boykin, Thurman) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jackson HMA, LLC from Circuit Court of Hinds County, MS, case number 25CI1:21-cv-561-AHW. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid; receipt number AMSSDC-4682443 ) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court File, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice Letter, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Abdul Bahro, M.D., #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
