Haskin v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Plaintiff: Frederick Haskin
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 3:2022cv00689
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: F Keith Ball
Referring Judge: Carlton W Reeves
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Stipulated Protective ORDER granting #10 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/26/23. (dfk)
January 25, 2023 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita)
January 23, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Pre-Discovery Disclosure by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Disclosure due by 1/19/2023; Jury Trial set for a two-week term of court commencing 4/1/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5B (Jackson) Reeves before District Judge Carlton W. Reeves; Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2024, time to be determined, in Chambers 5.550 (Jackson) Reeves before District Judge Carlton W. Reeves; Discovery due by 8/15/2023; Motions for Amended Pleadings due by 2/13/2023; Motions for Joinder of Parties due by 2/13/2023; Designate Experts Plaintiff Deadline due by 5/15/2023; Designate Experts for Defendant Deadline due by 6/15/2023; Motions due by 8/29/2023; Settlement Conference set for 10/3/2023 09:00 AM in Chambers 5.150 (Jackson) Ball before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. Seven (7) days before the settlement conference, the parties must submit via e-mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov an updated CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT MEMORANDUM. All parties, including a person with full settlement authority, are required to be present at the conference unless excused by the Court. If a party believes the scheduled settlement conference would not be productive and should be cancelled, the party is directed to inform the Court via e-mail of the grounds for their belief at least seven (7) days prior to the conference. ADR Report due by 12/29/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball on 1/19/2023. (JEJ)
January 13, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by Frederick Haskin (Jelliffe, Martin)
January 12, 2023 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball: Telephonic Case Management Conference held on 1/12/2023 in Jackson, MS. Appearing: Martin Jelliffe and Rajita Moss. (JEJ)
December 16, 2022 Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball. No later than seven (7) days prior to the TCMC, a confidential memorandum AND a proposed Case Management Order shall be submitted via e mail to ball_chambers@mssd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall set up the conference and, once all the parties are on the line, contact the Court at 601-608-4460. (JEJ)
December 7, 2022 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita)
November 30, 2022 Filing 4 State Court Record by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Moss, Rajita)
November 29, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas M. Louis on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Louis, Thomas)
November 29, 2022 Filing 2 ***ERROR***DISREGARD THIS ENTRY***NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas M. Louis on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Louis, Thomas) Modified on 11/29/2022 (KNS).
November 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP from Madison County Circuit Court, case number CI-2022-148. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSSDC-4991681) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - PL's Responses to RFA, #3 Exhibit C - Copies of process pleadings served on Walmart, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS)
November 29, 2022 DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2 : There is an error in this entry. It has been correctly refiled as Doc. 3. (KNS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haskin v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Haskin
Represented By: Martin R. Jelliffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Rajita Iyer Moss
Represented By: Thomas M. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?