Mabus v. American Medical Response Inc. et al
| Jacob Mabus |
| Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc. doing business as American Medical Response, American Medical Response Inc., John Doe Emergency Medical Dispatcher, ABC, DEF, and GHI and Ryan Wilson |
| 3:2024cv00510 |
| August 28, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| LaKeysha Greer Isaac |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American Medical Response Inc., Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc. from Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, case number 25CI1:24-cv-522-AHW. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BMSSDC-5485993) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Court File, #2 Exhibit B- Affidavit of Ryan Wilson, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
