Mabus v. American Medical Response Inc et al
| Jacob Mabus |
| Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc doing business as American Medical Response, John Doe Emergency Medical Dispatcher, American Medical Response Inc, ABC, DEF, and GHI and Ryan Wilson |
| 3:2024cv00631 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Andrew S Harris |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Rebuttal re #4 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Jacob Mabus (Chandler, Ann) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Response to Motion, by Jacob Mabus (Chandler, Ann) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The new deadline is Nov. 15. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 10/31/24. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE ON THIS MOTION. (AC)
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #6 Response to #4 Motion, filed by American Medical Response Inc, Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc, Ryan Wilson (Julian, Thomas) Modified on 10/30/2024 to add link to motion (ND). |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by American Medical Response Inc, Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc, Ryan Wilson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Affidavit of Ryan Wilson)(Julian, Thomas) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY except for remand-related discovery pending a ruling by the district judge on the Motion to Remand, at docket no. #4 . No further written order shall issue from the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 10/17/2024. (JEJ)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs filed by Jacob Mabus (Chandler, Ann) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand , MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs by Jacob Mabus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2017 Remand Order in Adams v. Piccadilly)(Chandler, Ann) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #2 , #3 : Attorney advises that there is an error in this entry, and it should be disregarded. It will be correctly refiled. (LAT) |
| Filing 3 ***ERROR***Disregard this entry.***MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION to Remand filed by Jacob Mabus (Chandler, Ann) Modified on 10/16/2024 (LAT). |
| Filing 2 ***ERROR***Disregard this entry.***MOTION to Remand by Jacob Mabus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2017 Remand Order in Adams v. Piccadilly)(Chandler, Ann) Modified on 10/16/2024 (LAT). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by American Medical Response Inc, Mobile Medic Ambulance Service Inc from Hinds County Circuit Court, MS, case number 25CI1:24-cv-522-AHW. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5522319) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Court File, #2 Exhibit B- Affidavit of Ryan Wilson, #3 Exhibit C- Plaintiff's Responses to Requests for Admission, #4 Exhibit D- Notice of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
