Henderson v. Balfour Beatty Rails, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sherman D. Henderson
Defendant: Balfour Beatty Rails, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2011cv00014
Filed: February 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Presiding Judge: David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Extend Deadline Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 10/11/2011 (dtj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Balfour Beatty Rails, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherman D. Henderson
Represented By: Marcie Tanner Southerland
Represented By: Jami L. Crews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Balfour Beatty Rails, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Lee Maron
Represented By: Laura Ford Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?