House v. Buckhalter et al
| Scotty S. House |
| Sue Buckhalter, Benj Yarbrough, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 5:2013cv00195 |
| October 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| Wilkinson |
| Michael T. Parker |
| David C. Bramlette |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 46 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/16/2016 (ECW)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER that the plaintiff, Scotty S. House, shall have ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order to file a response to defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 42 . If no response is filed, the Court will assume that the plaintiff has no objection to the motion. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/28/2015 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on June 2, 2015. (AA)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER rejecting 28 Report and Recommendations and remanding. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on December 4, 2014. (AA)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying plaintiff's letter (motion) 20 to appoint counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on March 17, 2014 (KPM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
