Hall v. Paper Converting Machine Company
| David Hall |
| Paper Converting Machine Company |
| 5:2018cv00120 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| David C Bramlette |
| Michael T Parker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosure by David Hall (Dowdy, Wayne) |
| Filing 6 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2019 3:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. Counsel shall dial 1.888.273.3658, code 1055457 to connect to the call. Confidential settlement memoranda are due on or before 1/9/19.(KPM) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Paper Converting Machine Company.(Williams, H.) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Paper Converting Machine Company answer due 12/7/2018. (MMc) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Paper Converting Machine Company shall file an Answer on or before 12/7/2018. No further written order shall issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on December 4, 2018. (MMc)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Paper Converting Machine Company (Williams, H.) |
| Filing 3 State Court Record by Defendant Paper Converting Machine Company (Williams, H.) |
|
TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Paper Converting Machine Company answer due 12/3/2018. No further written order shall issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on November 19, 2018. (MMc)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Paper Converting Machine Company (Williams, H.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Paper Converting Machine Company from Adams County Circuit Court, case number 18-0062. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0538-3850974) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit B- SOS Business Filings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Paper Converting Machine Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paper Converting Machine Company | |
| Represented By: | H. Wesley Williams, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Hall | |
| Represented By: | Wayne Dowdy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
