Oby v. John Doe
| Sherman Oby |
| John Doe, Captain J. Green, R. Logan, Warden Darrel Vannoy, S. Donaldson, Tracey Arbuthnot, Unknown Fair, Unknown Harris, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Matthew Shoettmer and Unknown Davis |
| Pro Se Department |
| 5:2022cv00054 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| David C Bramlette |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Robert H Walker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a written response consistent with this Order on or before September 7, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 08/24/2022 (CLR)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and setting payment schedule as set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 08/24/2022 (CLR)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #7 Amended Complaint, by Sherman Oby. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 8 ATTACHMENT re #6 by Sherman Oby. (KNS) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe, J. Green, R. Logan, Darrel Vannoy, S. Donaldson, Tracey Arbuthnot, Unknown Fair, Unknown Harris, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Matthew Shoettmer, Unknown Davis, filed by Sherman Oby. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 6 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis re #2 ORDER by Sherman Oby. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
| Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2, Acknowledgement filed by Sherman Oby. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(KNS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 8/1/2022. (LDR)
|
| Parties should include the newly assigned Magistrate Judge's initials BWR on future filings. (LDR) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 8/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H Walker on 7/18/2022 (VM)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: on or before 8/17/2022, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker on 7/18/2022 (VM) Modified on 7/18/2022 (VM).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, filed by Sherman Oby. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
