Seratt v. City of Marion, Illinois

Petitioner: Rodger Seratt
Respondent: City of Marion, Illinois
Case Number: 1:2011cv00095
Filed: May 31, 2011
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Ripley
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28:1361
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 1, 2011 3 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED as moot.An Order of Dismissal shall be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/1/2011. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seratt v. City of Marion, Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodger Seratt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: City of Marion, Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.